
One of my longstanding beliefs is that women should be completely subservient to men. (There, that should make me popular with NOW.) People have accused me of being misogynist, but I tell them that the idea of female submission hasn't harmed my eyesight in any way. This usually confuses them until they realize I was pulling a play on words.
Seriously, my view here is simple; it's the old saw "Even in an equal partnership, one partner has to be more equal than the other." The only way anything ever gets done in any sort of relationship, be it business, personal or sexual, is if one person has the final say and the other submits. Otherwise, you deadlock, indecisiveness, "waffling" and a bunch of running around and wasting of time while no one gets anything done.
It's my belief that in the great cosmic scale of things, God simplified the whole decision-making process over who leads and who follows by boiling it all down to this: Men rule and women obey. All the major religions take this for granted. When you look at it from an anatomical point of view, it all comes down to this: Men were designed to penetrate, and women were designed to be penetrated.
A lot of the woes of the world could be cured if men would stop being afraid to be MEN, take the reins of their families and lay the law down instead of trying to make everybody happy and not upset their wives / girlfriends / etc.
How far should female submission go? That's a post for another day, but for a hint, check out the attached icon ...